On Sun, 2002-07-14 at 21:53, Colin Watson wrote: > On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 01:25:04PM +0200, Helgi ?rn wrote: > I would say that if you're worried about it one way or the other then > you should probably improve your mail filters. :) > > For what it's worth, here's the relevant part of my .procmailrc: > > DEBLISTS=announce|devel|devel-announce|policy|private|user|testing|mentors|qa|qa-packages|legal > > # Gah. Every so often murphy's blocking seems to fail. > :0: > * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes > spam > > # murphy already runs spamassassin over Debian list mail. > :0: > * $^X-Mailing-List: <debian-($DEBLISTS)@lists\\.debian\\.org> > * ^X-Mailing-List: <debian-\/[^@]+ > debian/$MATCH > > This doesn't break when somebody Bcc:s a list, and it also makes the > mail filter significantly simpler than trying to split up To: and Cc: > lines correctly. (At least, I'm guessing you're objecting because your > filters deposited it somewhere you weren't expecting - I'm sorry if I'm > wrong.) > You are right about the filter thing...:-) I'm using Evolutions built in filter only at the moment but I'll save your mail for the moment I advance to Procmail, thank's for the tip. I recall having seen a mail from some listmanager at some time, asking people to use To: or Cc: for mail to the list, am I wrong about that? Cheers, HÖ -- ~~~~ <http://www.sacred-eagle.com/> ~~~~ ~~~~~~ Gnupg signature ID 83AC4814 ~~~~~
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part