[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Where is Debian going?



>>>>> "Alex" == Alex Malinovich <demonbane@the-love-shack.net> writes:

[...]

Alex> Unstable especially is very scary sounding to most users.

That's a good thing.  If you're scared by "unstable" you shouldn't be
running it.

Alex> Yet most Linux users using other distros (like RH, Mandrake, etc)
Alex> are using the same packages that we're using in Sid.

The issue isn't with the packages, but with the packaging.  The unstable
distribution often breaks due to broken dependencies, packages not being
uploaded at the same time, etc.  When you install a stable release, you
know that it will just work.  When you install straight to sid (I did
this last week), you cross your fingers, hoping that someone didn't
upload the newest foo package, which depends on libbar2.0 which hasn't
been uploaded yet (yes, this happens often), leaving you with a
completely unusable system.  Or that two packages don't have different
copies of the same file.  Etc, etc.  Even testing can break, though it's
highly unlikely (but testing also has the well-known problem of having
bad security support -- note I said testing, and not woody).  You really
shouldn't install anything other than stable unless you know what you're
doing, and by then, you won't be scared by the names "testing" and
"unstable".

Getting up-to-date packages to users is not solved by renaming the
distributions.  It is solved by getting the release delay down to a
reasonable time.  The developers know about this, and will figure it
out, after woody is released.

-- 
Hubert Chan <hubert@uhoreg.ca> - http://www.uhoreg.ca/
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA
Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7  5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA
Key available at wwwkeys.pgp.net.   Encrypted e-mail preferred.

Attachment: pgpwTQOc0YZ0U.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: