Re: Where is Debian going?
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 02:04:16 +0800
"csj" <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jul 2002 11:03:17 -0500
> "Jamin W. Collins" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > I see potato as a release for servers and other mission critical
> > systems. As such, I don't see much if any need for an X install on
> > these.
> That's the problem. It seems that in Debian stable=server. It's the same
> thing with posters who say they won't touch linux 2.4 because it isn't
> stable, when by stable they mean being able to run a system for one year
> without a reboot.
Which is exactly why I called it subjective in my post.
> Maybe instead of stable, testing, and unstable, we can have: server
> (must be stable), desktop (with newer but not bleeding edge stuff) and
> developer (because they're the ones who're in the best position to fix
I'd be all for it, it's just a matter of three new symlinks for the
Jamin W. Collins
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org