Re: please kindly get back to me
>On Mon, 1 Jul 2002 11:32:59 -0500 "Jamin W. >Collins"
<jcollins@asgardsrealm.net> wrote:
>
>However, as I've stated before messages such as these should be filtered
>by the list itself rather than be propagated to the entire list of
>subscribers, regardless of whether the subscribers have automated filters.
> The shear fact that many subscribers do have automated filters simply
>re-enforces the fact that it is possible (and in many cases easy) to
>install such filtering mechanisms.
I agree with this.
>Some people may claim that filtering of this nature would be against the
>free aspects of Debian. I (obviously) don't agree with this point of
>view. Just because we want something to be free doesn't mean that we
>should accept outright abuse. Messages such as this have nothing at all
>to do with Debian or anything remotely related to this list.
I replied to it to the list because I felt that
no one on this list would have any interest in
the contents of the message. I felt that maybe
if one of us spat on it, they would get the point
and not send another ...
->Scwawcaac<-
->The Soul Computer With Abundant Whipped Cream And A Cherry ... <-
->On Top!<-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: