[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: fsck bus error: 'attempt to access beyond end of device' during boot



>Hi,
>
>[Please Cc me on replies, I'm not subscribed.]
>
>The short summary:  When booting, my box gives >up, stating:
>
> NET4: Unix domain sockets 1.0 for Linux NET4.0.
> attempt to access beyond end of device
> 03:02: rw=0, want=1023464393, limit=48384
> dev 03:02 blocksize=1024 blocknr= ....
> ...
> /etc/init.d/rc.S: line 38: 10  segmentation >fault  loadkeys ...
> Activating Swap
> Adding swap
> checking root filesystem
> attempt to access beyond end of device
> 03:02: ...
> dev 03:02: ...
> ...
> /etc/init.d/rc.S: line 145: 19 bus error   fsck >${spinner} ...
> ...
> fsck failed
>
> Give root password for maintenance
>
>Giving a ^d and booting again fixes it: booting >fails and succeeds, with
>the phase of the moon.
>
>Does this mean my hardware is broken?  How can I >find out if this is the
>case?  Is my diskpartitioning corrupt?  What can >I do to investigate
>this problem further?  Would reinstalling the >box solve anything?
>
>The long story:
>
>This box (133 MHz Pentium, 48 MB Ram, hda: >QUANTUM BIGFOOT2100A, 2015MB
>w/87kB Cache, CHS=1023/64/63, Award Modular Bios >v4.51 PG 1996) used to
>run Windows.  I've run fips.exe on the disk, now >the disk looks like:
>
> Disk /dev/hda: 64 heads, 63 sectors, 1023 cylinders
> Units = cylinders of 4032 * 512 bytes
>
>   Device Boot    Start       End    Blocks   Id  System
> /dev/hda1   *         1       356    717664+   b  Win95 FAT32
> /dev/hda2           357       380     48384   83  Linux
> /dev/hda3           381       428     96768   82  Linux swap
> /dev/hda4           429      1023   1199520    5  Extended
> /dev/hda5           429       501    147136+  83  Linux
> /dev/hda6           502       864    731776+  83  Linux
> /dev/hda7           865      1023    320512+  83  Linux
>
>which gets mounted as
>
> Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/hda2              46M   26M   18M  59% /
> /dev/hda5             139M   37M   95M  28% /var
> /dev/hda6             703M  275M  392M  42% /usr
> /dev/hda7             303M  405k  287M   1% /home
> /dev/hda1             697M  531M  166M  77% /mnt
>
>fips didn't complain.
>
>I've installed Debian GNU/Linux woody, from 3.0.23-2002-05-21 rescue
>floppy disks.  The rest got fetched via the network.  Installation went
>flawless.  I installed Lilo, the machine boots Windows 98 just fine.
>
>However, when trying to boot Linux, there's this:
>
> Partition check:
>  hda: hda1 hda2 hda3 hda4 < hda5 hda6 hda7 >
> ...
> VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem) readonly.
> ...
> NET4: Unix domain sockets 1.0 for Linux NET4.0.
> attempt to access beyond end of device
> 03:02: rw=0, want=1023464393, limit=48384
> dev 03:02 blocksize=1024 blocknr= ....
> ...
> /etc/init.d/rc.S: line 38: 10  segmentation fault  loadkeys ...
> Activating Swap
> Adding swap
> checking root filesystem
> attempt to access beyond end of device
> 03:02: ...
> dev 03:02: ...
> ...
> /etc/init.d/rc.S: line 145: 19 bus error   fsck ${spinner} ...
> ...
> fsck failed
>
> Give root password for maintenance
>
>on the console, quite often.  Booting succeeds >about 50% of the times.
>
>BTW, the error occurs just after `NET4: Unix domain sockets 1.0 for
>Linux NET4.0.'.  Normally,
>
> Loading /etc/console/boottime.kmap.gz
> Adding Swap: 96764k swap-space (priority -1)
>
>occurs just after that.  Could there be a problem with boottime.kmap.gz?
>
>I checked the RAM, running memtest86 for about 15 hours.  It passed 70
>tests with 0 errors.
>
>I've run dselect successfully: banging on the disk does _not_ cause any
>errors when Linux succeeded to boot.  Running X and galeon causes no
>troubles either.  (I didn't notice any yet, that's for sure.)
>
>However, I'd very much like this box to boot fine always: I'm installing
>it for a friend, don't want to get him struggling with this.
>
>I'd be very glad if anybody could give me insight in what's happening
>here, and I'm very willing to give more information and do more testing
>if needed.
>
>Thanks for your time!

For the light answer (and completely useless), you don't have to censor fuck out of your email, here.  For a serious answer ... I'm totally at a loss.  But then, I'm still new to Linux, myself, and helplessly watched as Windoze at my data ...

->Scwawcaac<-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: