Re: Samba alternative
Except that the OP said he was dropping Windows hosts, so this concern is
irrelevant.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Andrew J Perrin - andrew_perrin@unc.edu - http://www.unc.edu/~aperrin
Assistant Professor of Sociology, U of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
269 Hamilton Hall, CB#3210, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3210 USA
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
> * curtis (curtis@npc-usa.com) spake thusly:
> > In a contribution to the Samba alternative discussion:
> >
> > I have heard on beachmark tests, Samba, however, is much faster than
> > NFS. In fact, as I understand this person recommends using SAMBA over
> > NFS even in pure Linux environment for this reason alone.
> >
> > Does anyone know otherwise?
>
> Well, I'm sure it'll work just fine if everyone always
> logs in as root. Otherwise there is this little problem
> with file ownerships/permissions: they don't map between
> Unix and Windows all that nicely.
>
> Dima
> --
> I like the US government, makes the Aussie one look less dumb and THAT is a
> pretty big effort. -- Craig Small
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: