[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: The latest round of antivirus bouncebacks



On Wednesday 10 April 2002 10:45 pm, Gary Turner wrote:
[snip]
> >>
> >> Mailing lists should be treated like usenet, only better ;-)
> >
> >thanks for the input. so, on attachments, none? some?
> >
>
> I have no problem with attachments.  In many cases, where a file is
> long, attachments are preferred.  I often have neither the
> qualifications nor interest needed to enjoy wading through pages of this
> script or that configuration.  I do often benefit from the commentary
> and queries though.  If I do want to see it, opening is trivial.
>
> Think of it as an if(), inline a small instruction, put a big one out of
> the way.

  1. no spam

  2. text-only (no html, ms-tnef, etc.)

  3. wrap text

   4. attachments ?

how about a stipulation that attachments also be plain text only? does that 
negatively encroach on pgp signatures in any way?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: