update-rc.d not found in PATH during upgrade
I'm trying to install a fresh woody system.
What I did was a base install of potato on a Pentium II PC.  I used the compact 
1.44 floppies for i386, and installed the base via NFS from a Mac that's running 
debian unstable.  I didn't select any software packages to install, but I let 
the potato installation complete without any of the optional packages and then 
rebooted.
Then I tried using the "go-woody" script that I found on the debian website to 
move my installation to woody.  Let's see it's at:
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/quick-reference/examples/go-woody
For the most part this went well, and ran for a long time.  One concern I had 
was that util-linux was removed with a stern warning, and the upgrade continued 
for a long time without it.  I received periodic messages about being unable to 
exec modprobe.
But then it stopped with this message:
dpkg: `update-rc.d' not found in PATH
and the script terminated.  It says something about certain directories like 
/sbin needing to be in root's path, and they all are, as I can see by typing 
"echo $PATH".
  I think it was running the apt-get dist-upgrade that's at the end of the 
go-woody script.
I tried running dpkg manually, for example dpkg -i util-linux, and I get the 
same error.  If I go into dselect and tell it to configure pending packages I 
get that error.
I fear that my installation is wedged.  I am afraid to reboot.  Help me!
Thanks,
Mike
PS.  I've been using Debian unstable on Mac/PowerPC for some time now, but this 
is the first time I've installed debian at all on x86.  I've been using 
slackware for years.  So I'm experienced with Linux and x86, but only modestly 
so with debian installation.
--
Michael D. Crawford
GoingWare Inc. - Expert Software Development and Consulting
http://www.goingware.com/
crawford@goingware.com
     Tilting at Windmills for a Better Tomorrow.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: