[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: VERY OT: On Censorship.



>>"Timothy" == Timothy R Butler <tbutler@uninetsolutions.com> writes:

 Timothy> Hello,
 Timothy>   I want to clear up a bit of confusion about my statements.

 >> So you're going to dictate how tax money is spent, based on your
 >> minuscule contribution to the whole?  My tax dollar is in there, too.
 >> You want to deny me the benefits of my contribution?

 Timothy>   No. Let me put it another way, perhaps, that would be
 Timothy> better. If you want your library to carry Mein Kampf (which
 Timothy> I now regret using as an example), I suppose I can't argue
 Timothy> with that - however, you should donate the book, and not
 Timothy> expect (potentially) my tax payment to buy the book for you.

	I see. You contribute tax dollars, and you want to have
 control over the books that are bought. I contribute tax dollars, I
 suppose I should get similar control. Who, then, gets to control what
 books get bought? There would likely be some constituency offended by
 any of the potential books being bought, so we buy nothing for public
 libraries? 

 >> Actually, it probably does.  It is likely in a restricted area, or on
 >> fiche or disk.  It, like Playboy, Time, Newsweek, and Sports Illustrated
 >> are major periodicals and any quality library will stock them.

 Timothy>   No, I'm pretty sure I can say it does not 'round here. I'm
 Timothy> not sure about in your neck of the woods.

	I am glad I have access to a more full featured poblic library.

 Timothy>   I don't believe in teaching by showing madmen's
 Timothy> works. They are, often times convincing, and many a person
 Timothy> could be lead into believing their thoughts - I don't want a
 Timothy> bunch of bin Ladens being made even by a fraction with my
 Timothy> money.

	Ignorance is what ideologues thrive on -- and you, sir, seem
 to be advocating precisely the ignorance that fosters
 fundamentalism. 


 Timothy> However, as I have said before, I'm not dictating what
 Timothy> anyone reads privately. But, just like my city hall can't
 Timothy> have a Nativity scene out front without fearing litigation
 Timothy> (isn't that censoring?), I'm not so sure that my library
 Timothy> should have radical Islamic documents.

	Why single out islam? Radical Christian doctrine drove the
 crusades, and radical Hindu jingoism is running rampant in
 Ayodhya. 

 Timothy> To sum things up - I do not believe in Talbanic (is that a
 Timothy> word?)  censorship. I believe that a library or other public
 Timothy> or private institution has a right to censor what they have
 Timothy> under their direct control (how about the kids that get in
 Timothy> trouble at school for having shirts with Christian sayings
 Timothy> on them?).

	Or who are prevented from exercising their religion for the
 lack of a blood altar at schools.

	Indeed. And the

	manoj
-- 
 Nondeterminism means never having to say you are wrong.
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C



Reply to: