[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GnuCash vs MoneyDance



On Sat, 2002-03-09 at 14:35, James D Strandboge wrote:
> In addition to doing all my household/personal finances with it, I  use
> gnucash for accounts/receivable, invoicing and reports for consulting I
> do on the side and have been very pleased with gnucash's capabilities. 
> It has much improved reports over the 1.4 series.  It also has support
> for stocks, etc-- but admittedly I don't use that feature much.  Also, I
> have a client who uses gnucash for his small business-- and he is very
> happy with it.  I am not a quicken user, but people I've talked to who
> have used quicken (at least older versions ca. 1998) and gnucash say
> that gnucash is better from an accounting perspective.  But take that
> for what it is worth-- it is second hand and anecdotal.
> 
> > 
> > GnuCash is DFSG-free, if that sort of thing appeals to you.
> This is indeed a compelling argument to at least try it.  You can get it
> through ximian if you use potato or get it straight from woody/sid if
> you use those.  I don't know moneydance's requirements now-- but when I
> tried it before (around a year ago), it was too slow on my machine
> (though I only have a PII 233).

Personally, I would very much prefer to keep my system as free as
possible. I'd much prefer to use gnucash over some other alternative,
but so far I've found it severely lacking in one area, and that's
importing bank statements via QIF. I use my Discover and American
Express cards quite a bit, and entering each of those transactions into
gnucash by hand would get very tedious very quickly. Other than that, I
love gnucash. Unfortunately, for me at least, that's reason enough to
start looking elsewhere.

-Alex

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: