Re: Still looking to replace Eudora
On Fri, 2002-03-08 at 10:30, Brian Stults wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-03-08 at 10:19, O Polite wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2002-03-08 at 12:48, Brian Stults wrote:
> > > Search the web for the unofficial debian package for gnome-spell.
> > > Install it and spell-checking in evolution will work.
> > >
> >
> > http://www.luyer.net/EvoBuilds/spell-checking/gnome-spell_0.3-0_i386.deb
> >
> > Thes unofisial package installles nisely. And is allso a reel eggo
> > boster, kause it didnt finnd a cingle speling eror in this dockument!
> >
> > Am I missing something? Some hidden setting somewhere?
> >
>
> I think it runs by default once you install the package. At least
> that's how it works for me. When I cut and paste your message into a
> new message, it detects all the misspellings.
>
> Did you install all the dependencies (e.g. aspell, pspell) and a
> dictionary?
Hi,
These are the official packages that are installed on my machine:
aspell-en 0.33.7.1-8 English dictionary for aspell
dict 1.5.5-7 Dictionary Client
wenglish 2.0-2 English dictionary
aspell 0.33.7.1-8 A more intelligent replacement for the
ispell spell checker
aspell-en 0.33.7.1-8 English dictionary for aspell
gaspell 0.30-10 Gnome front end to the aspell spell checker
libaspell10 0.33.7.1-8 The aspell spell checker runtime libraries.
libpspell4 0.12.2-5 Portable spell checker interface library
In addition to these, are you all (O & Brian) saying that I need
the unofficial gnome-spell package?
_Why_ is gnome-spell not an official package?
Thanks,
Ron
--
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ron Johnson, Jr. Home: ron.l.johnson@cox.net |
| Jefferson, LA USA http://ronandheather.dhs.org:81 |
| |
| "(Women are) like compilers. They take simple statements |
| and make them into big productions." |
| Pitr Dubovitch |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
Reply to: