Re: Mail clients (and text editors)
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 09:38:37PM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
> Evolution:
No comment other than lots of eye candy and resource demands.
Several like it. It and its brethren nautilus are just to
resource intensive for my old hardware.
> Mahogany:
No idea.
> Aethera:
No idea.
> Balsa:
Possibly dead?
> Sylpheed: (which I just read about on this list).
Works pretty well. Is fairly lightweight. I noticed it leaks a
significant amount of memory over time (days). No idea about
IMAP support (think it's supported, don't know how well).
Several people like kmail, I haven't looked at it in year(s). I've gone
back to mutt and VIM after playing with GUI's for a few months...
> And not related to email, anyone have a replacement suggestion (other than
> Emacs ;) for my old basic friend on the windows side of Program File Editor
> (pfe)?
Too many possibilities. I'm a VIM fan, so that's about all I can say...
> I'd also like to find a nice client like SecureCRT for linux. Something a
> little more feature rich than xterm.
Which features are missing?
--
Eric G. Miller <egm2@jps.net>
Reply to: