Re: woody kernel question
I have used 2.4.17 without problems. If 2.2.18 is what comes with woody
now, then I guess it looks like favourite for the woody release.
Tom
Geoff Ludwiczak wrote:
>
> I have been using kernel 2.4.18-pre9 for the past couple days and see no
> problems with it so far. I was using 2.4.17 before, and had no troubles with
> it either. Try 2.4.17, but if you're going to use 2.2, then just use 2.2.20.
>
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 08:34:00PM -0800, Paul E Condon wrote:
> > I have just done dist-upgrade from Potato to Woody. I have been using/learning
> > Debian for a few months. This was the first serious change from my initial
> > installation. The upgrade went smoothly, but took a while at 56k. I found many
> > nice improvements, but saw that the kernel had not been upgraded. I suppose I
> > could have known this before hand if I had read the right documents more
> > carefully, but I didn't.
> >
> > Now I look at the offerings of kernels in dselect. Which is recommended?
> > Of course I have to choose one that corresponds to my CPU, but what of
> > versioning? I see 2.2.20, 2.4.13, 2.4.14, 2.4.16, and 2.4.17. There are
> > limits to my adventurousness. Which is the likely choise for the default
> > Woody kernel when it becomes "stable"? I think I would like to use that one
> > if there are not good reasons to avoid it now.
> >
> > Thanks.
> > --
> > Paul E Condon
> > pecondon@quiknet.com
> >
> >
> > --
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> >
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: