[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: USB Printer Setup Problem



On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 02:14:29PM -0500, Thomas H. George wrote:

My fault.  I mistakenly built the kernel with UHCI when I should have used OHCI.

	Tom George

> On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 10:43:14AM -0500, Jerome Acks Jr wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 04:23:00PM -0500, Thomas H. George,,, wrote:
> > > I have an Epson StylusColor 860 which I wish to use on a usb port.  I 
> > > compiled my 2.2.19 kernel with usb support, usb file support and usb 
> > > printer.  cat /proc/bus/usb/devices is emplty, cat /proc/bus/usb/drivers 
> > 
> > I would expect /proc/bus/usb/devices to at least list your USB root hub.
> > On boot or when you first load usbcore.o and usb-uhci.o/uhci.o/ohci.o 
> > modules, what is logged in /var/log/messages? 
> 
> The following lines are in /var/log/messages:
> 
> 		usb.c: registered new driver usblp
> 		usb.c: registered new driver usbdevfs
> 		usb.c: registered new driver hub
> 
> but still /proc/bus/usb/devices is an empty file.
> 
> > 
> > > shows:
> > > 
> > >              hub
> > >              usbdevfs
> > >  0- 15: usblp
> > > 
> > > I have checked BIOS (and that other operating? system accesses the 
> > > printer with no difficulty).  One reference lists a long series of codes 
> > > to be sent by uniprint to wake up the printer in usb mode but apt-get 
> > > doesn't know about uniprint.
> > > 
> > > Is there a good stable solution to this problem?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
> > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact 
> > > listmaster@lists.debian.org
> > > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Jerome
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 



Reply to: