[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: pine?



On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 01:12:31PM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 11:43:59AM -0600, Michael Jinks wrote:
> > The "./debian/rules" command fails; the first error I notice is:
> > 
> > cc -O2  -g  -DLNX -DSYSTYPE=\"LNX\" -DMOUSE   -c -o addrbook.o addrbook.c
> > make[1]: cc: Command not found
> 
> The gcc package should install a link in /usr/bin/cc. What does
> '/usr/sbin/update-alternatives --display cc' say?

sh-2.03# /usr/sbin/update-alternatives --display cc
cc - status is manual.
 link currently points to /usr/bin/gcc
/usr/bin/gcc - priority 20
 slave cc.1.gz: /usr/man/man1/gcc.1.gz
Current `best' version is /usr/bin/gcc.

But /usr/bin/cc didn't exist; I made the link manually.  Solved that problem,
but now I get different ones:

...
ar ru libpico.a attach.o ansi.o basic.o bind.o browse.o buffer.o composer.o display.o file.o fileio.o line.o osdep.o pico.o random.o region.o search.o spell.o tinfo.o window.o word.o
ranlib libpico.a
cc  -O2 -g -Dlnx -DPOSIX -DJOB_CONTROL -DMOUSE -DTERMCAP_WINS main.c libpico.a  -lncurses -o pico
/opt/bin/ld: /usr/lib/libncurses.so: mkdir: invalid version 2 (max 0)
/usr/lib/libncurses.so: could not read symbols: Bad value
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[1]: *** [pico] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/pine/pine-3.96M/pico'
...
...
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/pine/pine-3.96M/pine/osdep'
cc -o includer includer.c
/opt/bin/ld: /lib/libc.so.6: _dl_sysdep_start: invalid version 7 (max 6)
/lib/libc.so.6: could not read symbols: Bad value
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [includer] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/pine/pine-3.96M/pine/osdep'
rm -f os.c
ln -s osdep/os-lnx.c os.c
cc -O2  -g  -DLNX -DSYSTYPE=\"LNX\" -DMOUSE   -c -o os.o os.c
cc: os.c: No such file or directory
cc: No input files
make[1]: *** [os.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/pine/pine-3.96M/pine'

Further down there are more errors as a result of pine not being built.

So, missing libraries maybe, or a version mismatch of some kind?

Thanks...

-m



Reply to: