Re: pine?
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Michael Jinks wrote:
> Further down there are more errors as a result of pine not being built.
>
> So, missing libraries maybe, or a version mismatch of some kind?
>
Now might be a good time for me to plug my unofficial binary package of
pine 4.43. It's available from http://www.braincells.com/open/
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <jaldhar@debian.org>
It's a girl! See the pictures - http://www.braincells.com/shailaja/
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: pine?
- From: Michael Jinks <mjinks@uchicago.edu>