also sprach Brian Nelson <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2001.12.26.2221 +0100]: > Not true! I switched from mutt to gnus. It's IMAP support was too > weak for me, yes, IMAP is not a strength. but then again, an IMAP client isn't really a MUA on the same scale of interpretation that mutt without IMAP is one... > and I didn't like the single window nature of it (you can't compose > a message and read other mail at the same time). but you can happily spawn two hundred separate instances and point them wherever you like... it works just fine i find, it's lightweight, and it's fast... then again, i've never used anything else... > Mutt's ok. It does the important things right, but otherwise is > rather mediocre. it's a MUA that already features a POP3 client and some IMAP. that's overkill. when you see a MUA as a mailer that doesn't simply communicate with the real backend through IMAP, then it's the best thing out there... IMHO. let's not start a flame war ;) -- martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:" net@madduck yesterday it worked. today it is not working. windoze is like that.
Description: PGP signature