Re: About the i586 / i386 ' optimized releases ' differences ?
- To: email@example.com
- Subject: Re: About the i586 / i386 ' optimized releases ' differences ?
- From: Andras BALI <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 20:55:07 +0100
- Message-id: <20011114205507.C14469@null>
- Mail-followup-to: email@example.com
- In-reply-to: <008801c16d0b$5678a6e0$0201a8c0@fr>
- References: <008801c16d0b$5678a6e0$0201a8c0@fr>
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 01:53:20PM +0100, spear wrote:
> I was wondering, about the fact some Linux distributions are " optimized "
> for i586 processors : what does it really change ? Are there any benchmarks
> comparing a distribution giving the choice of both i386/i586 ?
I don't know any, but you may find some interesting results at
IIRC the average benefit is about only 5%, which may be somewhat
higher (eg. gzip compresses about 10-12% faster) in some cases.
In case you're interested, there's a project for recompiling potato
for the i586 at <http://debian.fsn.hu/>. The status report says that
they've already recompiled ~85 percent of the distribution with
BALI, Andra's GPG keyID: 78560E1C
firstname.lastname@example.org email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.org