Re: uptime

[Dimitri Maziuk <dmaziuk@yola.bmrb.wisc.edu>]

* Rino Mardo (rmardo@yahoo.com) spake thusly:
> On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 01:45:41PM -0500 or thereabouts, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
> > * Craig Dickson (crdic@yahoo.com) spake thusly:
> > > will trillich wrote:
> > > 
> > > > $ uptime
> > > >  12:44am  up 365 days,  1:31,  2 users,  load average: 0.10, 0.03, 0.01
> > > > 
> > > > break out the root beer!
> > > 
> > > Congrats! I think I'll show this to a few Windows users. 
> > 
> > Hmm. We had an NT swerver with about 8 months uptime at work[n - 1].
> > The only reson it got rebooted was because we bought a rack and had
> > to switch the fscker off to put it in there. So it's not the OS, it's
> > how you use it...
> > 
> so you mean you've never used your nt server at all hence the
> unbelievable uptime?  don't get me wrong here i just can't believe the
> figures

We didn't run luser apps on it, except Access (well, DAO, actually). Other 
than that it was serving files 24/7. And it was NT _server_, not WS.

Dima
-- 
In cyberspace no one can hear you laugh       -- Bill Bumgarner in RISKS 21.65