Re: uptime

[Rino Mardo <rmardo@yahoo.com>]

On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 01:45:41PM -0500 or thereabouts, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
> * Craig Dickson (crdic@yahoo.com) spake thusly:
> > will trillich wrote:
> > 
> > > $ uptime
> > >  12:44am  up 365 days,  1:31,  2 users,  load average: 0.10, 0.03, 0.01
> > > 
> > > break out the root beer!
> > 
> > Congrats! I think I'll show this to a few Windows users. 
> 
> Hmm. We had an NT swerver with about 8 months uptime at work[n - 1].
> The only reson it got rebooted was because we bought a rack and had
> to switch the fscker off to put it in there. So it's not the OS, it's
> how you use it...
> 
so you mean you've never used your nt server at all hence the
unbelievable uptime?  don't get me wrong here i just can't believe the
figures

-- 
"In is out and out is in.  But out is out and in is in."
	-- Pumbaa

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com