[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Kernel 2.4.x woes



Matt Jones saw fit to inform me that: 
>>>| Could you please explain straightforwardly, step by step how you
>>>| compiled your kernel?
>
>Make sure you enable initrd when you are doing the xconfig. It is not 
>something that stands out greatly and I missed it a few times. After 
>enabling the initrd I was able to compile with no problems at all.

I have seen lot of threads here about initrd image which is required it
seems for 2.4.x kernels ? But I have always compiled the kernel without any
initrd stuff and the kernel boots fine.

There is no initrd in my /boot.

rajesh@debian:/boot$ l
total 3184
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root       419469 Aug 12 20:22 System.map-2.4.8
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root       428802 Sep  2 15:10 System.map-2.4.9
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root          512 Jul 14 19:45 boot.0300
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root         4568 Jul 14 19:44 boot.b
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root          612 Jul 14 19:44 chain.b
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root        20187 Aug 12 20:08 config-2.4.8
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root        20578 Sep  2 14:56 config-2.4.9
drwxr-xr-x    2 root     root         4096 Sep  2 15:11 grub
-rw-------    1 root     root        33792 Jul 15 00:31 map
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root          512 Jul 14 19:44 mbr.b
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root          640 Jul 14 19:44 os2_d.b
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root       730588 Jul 14 22:03 redhat
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root       752902 Aug 12 20:22 vmlinuz-2.4.8
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root       788789 Sep  2 15:10 vmlinuz-2.4.9
rajesh@debian:/boot$ 

What is this initrd ? Why it is required when kernel boots without it ?

Thanks in advance.

Regards

--
Rajesh


-- 
:
[Linux One Stanza Tip]	From : <aoga@Mail.Linux-Consulting.com>
LOST #073	 -**< Sub : Backing Up your System >**-
Been thinking about how to back up your  LINUX  system ? There
is a whole website just for you:
	http://www.Linux-Backup.net/app.gwif.html
Concepts, methods, applications, procedures... Have a look!
:



Reply to: