[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Quoting styles, cont (Was Re: Fonts in GTK)



Well that's the problem, isn't it?  Karsten (and yourself, variously)
isn't really "putting up" with it, now is he?

On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Nathan E Norman wrote:

>On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 06:11:03PM -0700, Eric G. Miller wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 03:10:27PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
>> >     but this practice is strongly deprecated.
>>                            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> 			   Hell does that mean?
>>
>> Webster's Ninth Collegiate Dictionary has this to say...
>>
>>     dep-re-cate  1. to express mild or regretful disapproval of  2.
>>     DEPRECIATE
>>
>> I "strongly mildly dissapprove" of that quoting convention! Huh?
>
>"deprecate" is a common technical term (hang out at the IETF for a
>while).  When a standard is trached, it is marked "deprecated" so
>people know that though they might have to put up with it from others,
>they shouldn't implement or use it themselves.
>
>Perhaps Karsten should have used "discouraged" rather than deprecated,
>but close enough.
>
>

-- 
         * You are not expected to understand this.
--comment from Unix system 6 source, credited to Lions and Johnson
Who is John Galt?  galt@inconnu.isu.edu, that's who: finger me for GPG key






Reply to: