Re: Newbieish question
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 03:43:30AM +0100, Neil Durant wrote:
> Brian Ballsun-Stanton <brian@pax.ath.cx> writes
> >This is my dilemma: to run samba-tng, I have to upgrade to "unstable." My
> >mandate explictly states that downtime is *BAD*, very, very, very,
> >bad. How risky is running unstable? What shouldn't I do? Should I upgrade
> >to 2.4.6? (I'm running a home box as a testbed for this, so I'll be warned
> >slightly in advance, but...)
>
> Why won't your basic Samba from stable do what you need? It works for
> me, with Win2k clients!
Works for me too with Win2K clients. My server runs
potato with a 2.2.17 kernel.
Sam
--
(Sam Varghese)
http://www.gnubies.com
Reply to: