[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Newbieish question



I meant as a PDC :)
File sharing, sure, it works with my 2k box now, but I heard that it uses
legacy auth stuff. 

On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Sam Varghese wrote:

> Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 14:37:51 +1000
> From: Sam Varghese <sam@gnubies.com>
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Newbieish question
> Resent-Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2001 14:38:17 -0700
> Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> 
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 03:43:30AM +0100, Neil Durant wrote:
> > Brian Ballsun-Stanton <brian@pax.ath.cx> writes
> > >This is my dilemma: to run samba-tng, I have to upgrade to "unstable." My
> > >mandate explictly states that downtime is *BAD*, very, very, very,
> > >bad. How risky is running unstable? What shouldn't I do? Should I upgrade
> > >to 2.4.6? (I'm running a home box as a testbed for this, so I'll be warned
> > >slightly in advance, but...)
> > 
> > Why won't your basic Samba from stable do what you need?  It works for 
> > me, with Win2k clients!
> 
> Works for me too with Win2K clients. My server runs
> potato with a 2.2.17 kernel.
> 
> Sam
> 



Reply to: