also sprach DvB (on Wed, 11 Jul 2001 03:40:00PM -0500): > I'm willing to be that's exactly what they're talking about. There was > quite a to do about this a year or so ago when it happened at some large > company which then banned linux. I believe you have to explicitly tell > samba in the config file to become the master browser though... I don't > think being elected is a problem. However, I'm not a samba expert either... redhat's samba has this on by default. debian's doesn't. election priorities are on a scale between 0-20 (this is all from memory, don't flame me if i am wrong). now tell me *why*, just *why* did these clowns in redmond decide on *7* for their domain server? because they wanted to have an additional 6 priorities that could always steal the master browser position and screw around? another case of micro$oft can't even copy the others correctly (did micro$oft *ever* do anything *original*, or did they *ever* copy something *right*?) martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; net@madduck -- f u cn rd ths, u cn gt a nce jb in th prgrmng indstry
Attachment:
pgpkGG58GKJQJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature