[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[NAVER-MAILER@naver.com: ???? ???? ???? ???? <bigice@naver.com>]



WTF?

----- Forwarded message from NAVER-MAILER@naver.com -----

From: NAVER-MAILER@naver.com
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 07:13:39 +0900 (KST)
To: <dmaziuk@yola.bmrb.wisc.edu>
Subject: ¸ÞÀÏ Àü¼Û ½ÇÆÐ ¾Ë¸² <bigice@naver.com>
X-Mailer: NAVER Mailer 1.0


    [1][logo_dmnaver.gif] 
   ?????? (bigice) ???? ?????? ???? <Re: devfs> ?? ?????? ???? ??????
   ???? ????????????.
    --------------------------------------------
    ???????? ???? ???? ?????? ?????? ????????. ?????? ???? ????????????.
    --------------------------------------------

References

   1. http://www.naver.com/

X-Envelope-Sender: dmaziuk@yola.bmrb.wisc.edu
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 17:14:33 -0500
From: Dimitri Maziuk <dmaziuk@yola.bmrb.wisc.edu>
To: "debian-user@lists.debian.org" <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: devfs
Reply-To: dmaziuk@yola.bmrb.wisc.edu
Mail-Followup-To: "debian-user@lists.debian.org" <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 3B3BA67B.597364B2@seranoa.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i
X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.5
X-Disclaimer: Opinions expressed below are not necessarily those of my employers.
Organization: BioMagResBank
Resent-Message-ID: <QjKuEC.A.jT.Px6O7@murphy>
Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
X-Mailing-List: <debian-user@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/155313
X-Loop: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: debian-user-request@lists.debian.org

* Andrew Dixon (andrew.dixon@seranoa.com) spake thusly:
> Hi All,
> I was wondering if anyone out there has an oppinion on devfs.  I'm
> considering it for a system that I'm building and some real life
> experiences with it would be helpful.  
> 
> One of the topics that I'm researching is the fact that it's marked as
> experimental in the source.  The howto makes it seem as though it's
> stable.  Any thoughts on this?
> 
> Also the system that I'm considering it for may have a lot of devices or
> it may have very few.  This situation seems like one in which
> dynamically growing the /dev filesystem makes a lot of sence.
> 
> Any comments, rants, flames, etc. . . would be greatly appreciated.

I've switched to devfs at 2.4.2 and so far I had no problems. 
RTF /usr/src/linux/Documentation/filesystems/devfs/README, install devfsd, add
"devfs=mount" to append line in lilo.conf and you're all set.

Dima
-- 
E-mail dmaziuk at bmrb dot wisc dot edu (@work) or at crosswinds dot net (@home)
http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu/descript/gpgkey.dmaziuk.ascii -- GnuPG 1.0.4 public key
Well, lusers are technically human.                      -- Red Drag Diva in asr


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
E-mail dmaziuk at bmrb dot wisc dot edu (@work) or at crosswinds dot net (@home)
http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu/descript/gpgkey.dmaziuk.ascii -- GnuPG 1.0.4 public key
Well, lusers are technically human.                      -- Red Drag Diva in asr



Reply to: