[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [OT] Is Redhat *that* bad?



on Fri, May 18, 2001 at 04:01:36PM -0400, Noah L. Meyerhans (frodo@morgul.net) wrote:
> From the front page at http://www.linuxcentral.com :
> "Red Hat Linux 7.1 contains the basics for setting up a Linux
> workstation or server. Ideal for the ex..."
> 
> Now, I know Redhat's Linux distribution sucks, but is it bad enough that
> it should be considered "ideal for the ex"???

SFGate (the San Francisco Chron/Ex online) has a habit of breaking
words, and often shows a little "ass" on the front page....

Amusing in its own context.


-- 
Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com>    http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
 What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?       There is no K5 cabal
  http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/         http://www.kuro5hin.org

Attachment: pgpvnHfl8J81Z.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: