Re: Samba 2.2.0 and Debian 2.2r3
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> Hi all..
>
> Unstable has Samba 2.2.0 but it requires a newer version of libc than is
> supplied with 2.2r3. I'm a bit anxious about upgrading lib6 so I got the
> sources and compiled Samba under 2.2r3. It compiled fine. Anyone know of any
> issues to be aware of?
Yes: It's almost too damn new. Unless you need the capabilities Samba
2.2.x has over Samba 2.0.9, you should be running Samba 2.0.9 until the
2.2.x tree has seen more testing (unless, of course, you've been testing
it yourself for a while).
Beyond that... it works great on the systems I have at home. The ability
to change file permissions from the Windows GUI rocks :)
> I really need the new Samba in an attempt at ditching a few NT
> Servers!
You'll thank yourself. One of the most problematic boxes at work is the
WinNT file server...
- --
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Phil Brutsche pbrutsch@tux.creighton.edu
GPG fingerprint: 9BF9 D84C 37D0 4FA7 1F2D 7E5E FD94 D264 50DE 1CFC
GPG key id: 50DE1CFC
GPG public key: http://tux.creighton.edu/~pbrutsch/gpg-public-key.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE6/GcO/ZTSZFDeHPwRAjJsAKCUcfRpmAsjcY/uMdAF616Opiub9gCfRw8r
Urf0yh1uhogS549JmAE2MpI=
=qcnm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: