Re: Using Samba 2.2 as PDC
* On 07-05-01 at 02:07 Florian Petri (flop@flop.swb.de) wrote:
+----Here quoted text begins----+
[...]
>
> I?m currently thinking about compiling samba on my own, throwing out
> everything which doesn?t work like this PAM authentification and hopefully
> this will solve my problems. But I would prefer to use the binary distribution ...
Did you by any chance had any better success with hand built samba 2.2.0?
>
>
> cu Floh
>
+----and here the quote ends----+
Actually I am having the same problem:
May 8 21:50:56 ursa smbd[32522]: Matchname failed on neonatus-nt 192.168.1.4
May 8 21:50:56 ursa smbd[32522]: PAM: Account Validation Failed - Rejecting
+User!
May 8 21:50:56 ursa smbd[32522]: PAM: UNKNOWN ERROR for User: Administrator
May 8 21:50:56 ursa smbd[32522]: host name/name mismatch: neonatus-nt !=
+neonatus-nt.local.net
May 8 21:50:56 ursa smbd[32522]: [2001/05/08 21:50:56, 0]
+lib/util_sock.c:get_socket_name(1060)
May 8 21:50:56 ursa smbd[32522]: [2001/05/08 21:50:56, 0]
+lib/util_sock.c:matchname(1008)
May 8 21:50:56 ursa smbd[32522]: [2001/05/08 21:50:56, 0]
+passdb/pampass.c:pam_account(268)
May 8 21:50:56 ursa smbd[32522]: [2001/05/08 21:50:56, 0]
+passdb/pampass.c:pam_accountcheck(381)
Win9x machines login great.. everything works great, but when I try to log in
from the NT 4.0 wks I get an error saying the ser was disabled...
I have read the samba docs from the source package, searched over the samba
site, nowhere is anything mentioned on the topic... I have added the user
Administrator, the machine account also... but still that error. With the same
config and samba 2.0.7 it worked perfectly!
B.
--
Boštjan Müller [NEONATUS], neonatus@neonatus.net, http://neonatus.net/~neonatus
For my PGP key finger: neonatus@neonatus.net, RSA id: 0x90178DBD, ICQ #:7506644
Celular: +386(0)41243189, Powered by Debian GNU/LiNUX , Student of VFUL
The three Rs of Microsoft support: Retry, Reboot, Reinstall.
Reply to: