[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Unsubscribing issues (was Re: <no subject>)



Thank you Karsten for straightening me out.  I have seen other lists where, 
at the bottom (like this one) there is something like the following:

-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
--

I have seen folks misinterpret this (or just not look where they are 
inserting "unsubscribe").  Thought this was one of those "obvious" fixes, 
and, of course, I had not yet read the threads showing there really is a 
problem here.


On Friday 20 April 2001 01:14 pm, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> on Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 08:07:30AM -0700, JC Portlock 
(ke6ume@snowcrest.net) wrote:
> > On Friday 20 April 2001 02:03 am, Felicity wrote:
> > > unsubscribe
> >
> > Try again with  "unsubscribe" in the subject line.
>
> Nope.
>
> Standard unsubscription:
>
>     Send a message 'unsubscribe' to <list-name>-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
>
> Or, as a GNU/Linux command:
>
>     $ echo 'unsubscribe' | mail debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
>
> ...which is what the list tag used to say, but it was considered too
> confusing.  Subject line doesn't matter.
>
> Problems are supposed to be reported to listmaster@debian.org, but I'm
> seeing both list and personal mail (no, I'm not part of Debian
> International, I just get singled out), indicating problems or lack of
> response from this address.   Not sure how closely it's being monitored.
>
> Lists are great when they work and really, really frustrating when they
> don't *stop* working....  I can understand the frustrations.
>
> And, to eliminate confusion, I'm *not* trying to unsubscribe myself.


-- 
73,

JC Portlock KE6UME
ke6ume@arrl.net
ICQ# 14481033
===========================================
Professionals built the Titanic, but Amateurs built the Ark.
===========================================
Good judgment comes from experience,
and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.



Reply to: