Re: GLUG: Maildir performance with IMAP ?

To: Eugene van Zyl <evz@streetcar.com>
Cc: GLUG <glug@linux.org.za>, Debian-User <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: GLUG: Maildir performance with IMAP ?
From: Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 09:46:38 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20010405094638.A8897@rapier.smartspace.co.za>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] OJEFLNJDBPDANNEDGCBOOEBCDKAA.evz@streetcar.com>; from evz@streetcar.com on Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 08:48:33AM +0200
References: <[🔎] OJEFLNJDBPDANNEDGCBOOEBCDKAA.evz@streetcar.com>

On Thu 2001-04-05 (08:48), Eugene van Zyl wrote:
> Can anyone tell me wether there's a noticable performance hit when
> using IMAP with maildirs vs the flat file formats?
>
> Read the UW-IMAP docs which indicated that this was the case - anyone
> with experience that can comment?

Sam Varshavchik (author of Courier) recently (as in less than a week
ago) wrote a response to that documentation.  It is at
http://www.courier-mta.org/mbox-vs-maildir/

Neil
-- 
Neil Blakey-Milner
nbm@mithrandr.moria.org

Reply to:

References:
- Maildir performance with IMAP ?
  - From: "Eugene van Zyl" <evz@streetcar.com>

Prev by Date: Re: SMTP transaction error
Next by Date: Re: Keyboard lockup
Previous by thread: Maildir performance with IMAP ?
Next by thread: probleme de carte graphique
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread