on Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 03:44:42PM -0500, MaD dUCK (madduck@madduck.net) wrote:
> also sprach Robert Tucker (on Mon, 05 Mar 2001 11:40:07PM -0800):
> > Can I change my mind about this partition scheme later? If not, your
> > earlier recommendation included several more partitions and I'd like
> > to understand the change in thought. I don't have a problem with
> > partitions. It is my understanding that partitions add a margin of
> > 'safety' to the system.
>
> no, you won't be able to change that scheme (at least not easily).
> yes, they add to security, but you need to understand the implications
> first. however, given the excessive space that you have, i'd say go
> for it. there's almost nothing that can go wrong.
Hadn't been following this thread closely, but my $0.02 on partitioning
can be found at
http://kmself.home.netcom.com/Linux/FAQs/partition.html
Cheers.
--
Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? There is no K5 cabal
http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/ http://www.kuro5hin.org
Attachment:
pgpe4wYSHnWiL.pgp
Description: PGP signature