[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: autofs or automount?



hi ya jonathan...

use an automoutner cause...
- it automatically mounts the directories/parititions you need

- it automatically unmounts it when you no longer need it
	- minimize corrupting it/erasing it accidentally
	due to wierd/whacy errors likepower failures, hw resets


use autofs if you have simple mountings
	/home
	/var/spool/mail


use amd( ? ) if you need more interaction with sun, sgi, hp, etc..etc..
	- if you need multi-mounts, multi-homed mounts, sub-mounts, and
	failovers


you can explicitly manually mount.... if you only need it once in a while
	mount /dev/fd0 /mnt/floppy


when automounting stuff.... or in /etc/fstab and any automount config
files
	- use soft mounts...to prevent your system from hanging while
	the other machine on the other side of the lan is rebooting

	- use intr option so that you can controlC out of any hung process


	- use hard mount for things like /home where you have to wait
	for the home server to be up and running before you can do
	anything


penalty for using automounters...
	- you have to wait a few seconds for the resource to be maounted
	if its not yet available

horror stories...
	- dont use "hard" mounts unless you have to...
	( if you dont know why you need hard mounts....use soft mounts intead)

	- ( personal preferences )

To test the effects of the otehr machine on your own workstation....
	ls -la  the /other-server/home/foo/test.c
	( assuming it is automounted or hard mounted or manually mounted )

	pull the nic wire from the other-server

	- now site back and wait...till you get pissed....

have fun
alvin
http://www.linux-consulting.com/AutoFS/autofs-HOWTO.html


On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Jonathan Matthews wrote:

> Thanks to those who responded so . . succinctly <g> to my post about
> needing to do on-demand NFS mounting.
> 
> Just a quickie for the list, now: which should I use?
> What are the implications of using one over the other?
> Is either noticably faster, more robust, or simply better than the
> other?
> 
> Equally, has anyone got any horror stories about either . . ?



Reply to: