[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Help! - ppp zombies



~
Hello world,

Of late I'm getting spurious ppp entries shown by ifconfig.  It happens
when a modem goes down.  It might have been ppp3 but it comes up again as
pppx, where x is the next unused number and ppp3 becomes a zombie.  Right
now I have two "zombies", shown here with a valid entry in the middle.

ppp1      Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol
          UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP SLAVE MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:28980 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:27862 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:5

ppp2      Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol
          inet addr:203.91.66.225  P-t-P:203.91.65.14
Mask:255.255.255.255
          UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP SLAVE MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:15182 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:9526 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:5

ppp3      Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol
          UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP SLAVE MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:2991 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:8593 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:5

I have:-
  changed kernels (2.2.17 -> 2.2.18)
  upgraded ppp    (v2.3 -> v2.4)
but the problem persists.

As a result I often get a significant percentage of lost packets -
sometimes over 50%.

As you can see, I am using eql here but it has worked perfectly for years
and has not been fiddled with.

The only way I have found of putting things right is a reboot. I am at a
complete loss as to how to tackle this one.

Anyone?

Lindsay

-- 

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Lindsay Allen   <allen@cleo.murdoch.edu.au>    Perth, Western Australia
voice +61 8 9316 2486, 0403 272 564   32.0125S 115.8445E   Debian Linux
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=





Reply to: