[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Fw: X failure-- Help, please....



>From John Hammack,  Tom I am having the same problem so I am watch your
responses.  I will post mine again.  I tried all combinations that were
reasonable in the XF86Setup.  It's good to use because it has so many
options.  Sorry for the non-help.  John


----- Original Message -----
From: "Oki DZ" <okidz@telkom.net>
To: "Tom Schuetz" <ts22548@cybernetisp.net>
Cc: "Debian" <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 11:42 PM
Subject: Re: X failure-- Help, please....


> Tom Schuetz wrote:
>
> > Two things:
> >
> > I'm running potato, and I know my mouse is a ps/2, but it won't respond
at
> > all when I'm running the VGA server.
>
> Make sure that /dev/mouse is a link to /dev/psaux.
> Or, make sure that /dev/psaux is defined in XF86Config.
>
>
> > As for the SVGA server, I get this on startx:
> >
> > X: exec of usr/bin/X11/XF86_SVGA failed
> > _X11TranSocketUNIXConnect: can't connect: errno = 111
> > giving up.
> >
> > xinit: connection refused (errno 111) unable to connect to X server
> > xinit: No such process (errno 3): server error
>
> Do you have
> 127.0.0.1           localhost
> in your /etc/hosts?
>
> X uses the network, even if your machine doesn't have any NIC; that's
> why you'd need 127.0.0.1. Well, of course, in the /etc/init.d/network
> script, you'd need "ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1".
>
> Another thing... you'd need to have "Unix domain sockets" support in
> your kernel (or have it as a module).
>
> Oki
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> An implication embedded in this is that the socialist days
> of the Internet are over. Socially, the advent of IP-QoS is
> already being blamed for introducing a caste system on
> the Internet: the ``bit-haves'' and ``bit-have-nots''
> are becoming reality.
> http://www2.linuxjournal.com/lj-issues/issue62/3369.html
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: