Re: LAMP Question -- Perl AND PHP
It's been my experience that both have similar performance. For your
sanity's sake, I suggest doing the static mod_perl installation, then
one you have apache and mod_perl up and running, install php
dynamically.
Keep in mind that this isn't gospel, just what's worked best for me.
You may very well be able to compile both of them as static modules, it
just seems that the mod_perl installation doesn't lend itself to easily
to that solution.
-Rob
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 04:17:28PM -0600, Robert A. Jacobs wrote:
> Running a Debian 2.2r2 system with a little bit of Woodage (nothing
> extreme) and still using the 2.2.17pre-* kernel packaged with Potato.
>
> Am venturing into the world of LAMP (Linux Apache MySQL PHP) and
> would like to do the installations from source (for the experience --
> so please do not recommend that I use prepackaged .deb files).
> I've already downloaded the sources and have been reading through the
> various READMEs and INSTALL docs and now I have a few questions.
>
> I have gotten the (perhaps mistaken) impression that I cannot statically
> link Perl and PHP to Apache together. If this is not correct, how do
> you build Apache so that both mod_perl and PHP 4.0 are statically linked?
> The Apache 'README.configure' file was not specific on how to do this or
> even whether it could be done at all (though it provided adequate examples for
> them individually).
>
> If I must dynamically load mod_perl or PHP, which offers the best
> performance improvement when statically linked? Does dynamic linking of
> mod_perl and PHP reduce performance of both/either dramatically?
>
> Any other "gotchas" I should watch out for?
>
> Thanks for your time and your help,
>
> rob
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: