On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 04:42:02PM -0500, David B. Harris wrote: > To quote Pollywog <croak@shadypond.com>, > # I wonder why this is even an option; is there a reason anyone would > # install Linux without ext2 support? > # I have always wondered why the option was given. > > ReiserFS/ext3: Some people run ReiserFS or ext3, so they don't need ext2 > support built into the kernel. I am one of those persons....I am running a HP SCSI-based machine in a production environment for web- and e-mail-hosting purposes and I have compiled (2.2.17) with reiserfs builtin and ext2 as a module...just in case.....
Attachment:
pgpKqn9AsXQ2K.pgp
Description: PGP signature