Re: 2.4 kernel release

[John Griffiths <john@capmon.com>]

>
>Well, it's up to the release manager (and possibly debian-devel, but
>straw polls on mailing lists don't really count for very much), not even
>remotely debian-user. :) Remember that every Debian release has a hell
>of a lot of new stuff - potato was a year and a half after slink, apart
>from anything else. Any bumping of the version number tends to be at
>least in part a marketing thing (we don't have the "*.0 is randomly
>unstable, *.1 is OK, *.2 is fairly stable" thing that people talk about
>Red Hat having sometimes).
>

OK... 

i wasn't suggesting that debian-user would make the decision, 

i was more inquiring as to what the policy was.

2.4 ---> woody then?

something to think about.