[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: A very strange X problem



I forgot to mention that in my post that I can move the mouse around just like
you say. I have also thougth of it being a hardware-problem. Just out of
curiosity, what gfx-card do you have? I have a 3dfx voodoo3 2000 agp, maybe
there is some problem with the tdfx-driver.

* Paul Barton (paul@moonkhan.org) wrote:
> Joel, I have just recently been getting the same problem. First I thought it was my processors, then I thought it was XF4, then I thought it was enlightenment. It just locks my screen with everything frozen except the mouse, which moves around fine. Maybe this isn't a hardware problem like I initially thought :)
> 
> --Paul
> 
> * Joel St?bis (joel.stabis@home.se) wrote:
> > Hi.
> > 
> > I have a very stange problem with xf 4.0.x. Now and then X seems to crash in
> > some strange way. The screen stops updating, the keyboard doesn't work, the
> > only thing I can do is to hit the power-button and reboot.
> > 
> > This has happend with all versions of xf 4.0.x, under both redhat 6.2/7.0,
> > slackware 7.1 and debian (woody).
> > 
> > It always happend when draging the mouse around holding one button pressed
> > down, in all types of programs (netscape, gqview, the windowmanager etc).
> > 
> > I first thought that it was a problem with the windowmanager I user
> > (enlightenment), but it also happends in windowmaker and fvwm2.
> > 
> > I have no clue why this is happening, I hope someone out there has.
> > 
> > / Joel
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Paul Barton				http://www.moonkhan.org	
> paul@moonkhan.org		pbarton@online.emich.edu
> Key fingerprint = 8C15 DF76 65BA 2866 A424  74F5 A6C2 15CA 4A55 A365
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 
> 



Reply to: