[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: exim (probably broken thread)



> Just to still my curiousity could you first try once more without this
> "no dns" thingy,but with a longer aka list:
>
>   aka mtiwgwc21.worldnet.att.net worldnet.att.net ...

I did it, next my session:
tony@debian:~$ fetchmail -v -v
fetchmail: 5.3.3 querying postoffice.worldnet.att.net (protocol POP3) at Sat,
16 Dec 2000 16:23:03 -0500 (EST)
fetchmail: POP3< +OK InterMail POP3 server ready.
fetchmail: POP3> USER arodriguez
fetchmail: POP3< +OK please send PASS command
fetchmail: POP3> PASS *
fetchmail: POP3< +OK arodriguez is welcome here
fetchmail: selecting or re-polling default folder
fetchmail: POP3> STAT
fetchmail: POP3< +OK 1 3531
fetchmail: POP3> LAST
fetchmail: POP3< +OK 0
1 message for arodriguez at postoffice.worldnet.att.net (3531 octets).
fetchmail: POP3> LIST
fetchmail: POP3< +OK 1 messages
fetchmail: POP3< 1 3531
fetchmail: POP3< .
fetchmail: POP3> RETR 1
fetchmail: POP3< +OK 3531 octets
reading message 1 of 1 (3531 octets)
About to rewrite Return-Path:
<bounce-debian-user=arodriguez=worldnet.att.net@lists.debian.org>
Rewritten version is Return-Path:
<bounce-debian-user=arodriguez=worldnet.att.net@lists.debian.org>

fetchmail: analyzing Received line:
Received: from murphy.debian.org ([216.234.231.6])
          by mtiwgwc24.worldnet.att.net
          (InterMail vM.4.01.03.10 201-229-121-110) with SMTP
          id
<20001216211136.HJMD23905.mtiwgwc24.worldnet.att.net@murphy.debian.org>
          for <arodriguez@worldnet.att.net>;
          Sat, 16 Dec 2000 21:11:36 +0000
fetchmail: line rejected, mtiwgwc24.worldnet.att.net is not an alias of the
mailserver
About to rewrite Sender: jtc
Rewritten version is Sender: jtc@postoffice.worldnet.att.net

About to rewrite From: John Carline <jtc@stic.net>
Rewritten version is From: John Carline <jtc@stic.net>

About to rewrite CC: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Rewritten version is CC: debian-user@lists.debian.org
About to rewrite To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Rewritten version is To: debian-user@lists.debian.org

About to rewrite Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Rewritten version is Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org

About to rewrite Resent-Sender: debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
Rewritten version is Resent-Sender: debian-user-request@lists.debian.org

fetchmail: no local matches, forwarding to tony
fetchmail: SMTP< 220 debian ESMTP Exim 3.12 #1 Sat, 16 Dec 2000 16:23:10
-0500
fetchmail: SMTP> EHLO localhost
fetchmail: SMTP< 250-debian Hello tony at debian [127.0.0.1]
fetchmail: SMTP< 250-SIZE
fetchmail: SMTP< 250-PIPELINING
fetchmail: SMTP< 250 HELP
fetchmail: forwarding to localhost
fetchmail: SMTP> MAIL
FROM:<bounce-debian-user=arodriguez=worldnet.att.net@lists.debian.org>
SIZE=3531
fetchmail: SMTP< 250
<bounce-debian-user=arodriguez=worldnet.att.net@lists.debian.org> is
syntactically correct
fetchmail: SMTP> RCPT TO:<tony@localhost>
fetchmail: SMTP< 250 <tony@localhost> is syntactically correct
fetchmail: SMTP> DATA
fetchmail: SMTP< 354 Enter message, ending with "." on a line by itself
#***************************.****************************fetchmail: SMTP>.
(EOM)
fetchmail: SMTP< 250 OK id=147OnO-0000CE-00
 not flushed
fetchmail: POP3> QUIT
fetchmail: POP3< +OK arodriguez InterMail POP3 server signing off.
fetchmail: not swapping UID lists, no UIDs seen this query
fetchmail: SMTP> QUIT
fetchmail: SMTP< 221 debian closing connection
fetchmail: Deleting fetchids file.
fetchmail: normal termination, status 0
fetchmail: Deleting fetchids file.
You have new mail in /var/mail/tony
tony@debian:~$


Notice how there is another rejection, now of mti*24.worldnet.att.net
Perhaps using wild * can fix it? Something like aka
mtiwgwc*.worldnet.att.net?
It also bothers me that the mail comes to "tony" after bouncing, and I had
defined "arodriguez is tony
here".
Also, notice how in my previous posting there is the line
**** this below
About to rewrite Sender: tony
Rewritten version is Sender: tony@postoffice.worldnet.att.net
**** up to here

and there is no tony@postoffice.worldnet.att.net !!! At least, if there is,
is not me.

???????????????



Reply to: