[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: OT: port scan



on Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 09:18:34PM +0100, Philipp Schulte (p.schulte@matrix.uni-duisburg.de) wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 09:04:20PM +0100, Robert Waldner wrote: 
> 
> > >Shouldn't this be <abuse@attackers_provider>?
> > 
> > No, $yourproviders complaint is _much_ more likely to be taken 
> > seriously by $attackers_provider (and it can save you from a lot of 
> > embarassment if you´d misjudge something).
> > 
> > In other words: you have a better stand at $yourprovider cause it´s him 
> > your money goes to.
> 
> But what kind of pressure can $your_provider put on a portscanner from
> $evil_provider? 
> Phil

Domain-level blocking of...mail, news, DNS....

-- 
Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com>     http://www.netcom.com/~kmself
 Evangelist, Zelerate, Inc.                      http://www.zelerate.org
  What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?      There is no K5 cabal
   http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/        http://www.kuro5hin.org

Attachment: pgpcuvv5BdryO.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: