on Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 09:18:34PM +0100, Philipp Schulte (p.schulte@matrix.uni-duisburg.de) wrote: > On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 09:04:20PM +0100, Robert Waldner wrote: > > > >Shouldn't this be <abuse@attackers_provider>? > > > > No, $yourproviders complaint is _much_ more likely to be taken > > seriously by $attackers_provider (and it can save you from a lot of > > embarassment if you´d misjudge something). > > > > In other words: you have a better stand at $yourprovider cause it´s him > > your money goes to. > > But what kind of pressure can $your_provider put on a portscanner from > $evil_provider? > Phil Domain-level blocking of...mail, news, DNS.... -- Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com> http://www.netcom.com/~kmself Evangelist, Zelerate, Inc. http://www.zelerate.org What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? There is no K5 cabal http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/ http://www.kuro5hin.org
Attachment:
pgpkIk65Lahp3.pgp
Description: PGP signature