Re: ugly boot--resolved
cls-colo spgs wrote:
> kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 11:26:32PM -0600, cls-colo spgs (pplaw@pcisys.net) wrote:
> > > debs,
> > >
> > > i have a 5 minute, ugly boot:
> > >
> > > # dmesg
> > >
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > > SLIP: version 0.8.4-NET3.019-NEWTTY-MODULAR (dynamic
> > > channels, max=256).
> > > SLIP linefill/keepalive option.
> > > PPP BSD Compression module registered
> > > RPC: sendmsg returned error 101 rpc.statd forgot to set
> > > AF_INET in udp sendmsg. Fix it!
> > > RPC: sendmsg returned error 101
> > > RPC: sendmsg returned error 101
> > > RPC: sendmsg returned error 101 portmap: server
> > > localhost not responding, timed out
> > > RPC: sendmsg returned error 101
> > > RPC: sendmsg returned error 101
> > > RPC: sendmsg returned error 101
> > > RPC: sendmsg returned error 101 portmap: server
> > > localhost not responding, timed out lockd_up: makesock
> > > failed, error=-5
> > > RPC: sendmsg returned error 101
> > > RPC: sendmsg returned error 101
> > > RPC: sendmsg returned error 101
> > > RPC: sendmsg returned error 101 portmap: server
> > > localhost not responding, timed out
> > > registered device ppp0
> > >
> > > lots of error messages, eh?
> > >
> > > ...suggestions.
> >
> > DNS resolution errors? Is your network setup configuration correct?
> >
> > --
> > Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com> http://www.netcom.com/~kmself
> > Evangelist, Opensales, Inc. http://www.opensales.org
> > What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? There is no K5 cabal
> > http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/ http://www.kuro5hin.org
> > GPG fingerprint: F932 8B25 5FDD 2528 D595 DC61 3847 889F 55F2 B9B0
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature
>
> //
>
> yeah, i screwed up network configs a few weeks ago. i'm now trying to sort it all
> out. (i'd luv to get on my lan to "see" my office's dsl pipe and throw away the 56k
> connect. spoiled ain't i?) anyway, i just leave the box on all the time and
> 'cuz it's not w*doze, rebooting doesn't factor into the equation (unless i'm
> kerneling). (so, it's not a huge prob.)
>
> ...just thought there's a quick fix, but i knew that sooner or later, i'd have to
> dig in and get the networking thing down. (and here's my perfect opportunity.)
>
> thx.
>
> bentley taylor.
> (potato on 2.2.17)
>
> //
>
> --
> Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null
i had commented out "iface lo inet loopback" in /etc/network/interfaces for some
reason. uncommenting it was the fix . i have my pretty boot back!
ks, thx for the hints.
bentley taylor.
(potato on 2.2.17)
//
Reply to: