On Sat, Aug 19, 2000 at 03:57:58PM +0200, Florian Friesdorf wrote: > > Well, imho it makes no sense splitting of /usr/src. > Everthing in there is under package control. > > /boot 80MB > / 60MB why do this? just make / 60MB (or maybe 70/80) and lose the /boot partition, since / will fall completely under the 1024 cylindar mark there is no longer a point in a /boot partition. 80MB for /boot is rediculous anyway, unless you compile 10000 kernels or keep the source code in there... FWIW: [eb@socrates eb]$ df -h | head -2 Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/hda3 68M 20M 44M 31% / [eb@socrates eb]$ this machine is a powerpc with debian potato. [eb@plato eb]$ df -h | head -2 Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/hda1 68M 16M 49M 24% / [eb@plato eb]$ this machine is an x86 with debain potato. i have no /boot partition on either. > /usr 2GB > /usr/local 1GB > /var 1GB > /home 500MB this looks good. though if you expect to play mp3s more then compile programs from source you may wish to allocate more to /home and less to /usr/local > I think it's better to not have /tmp on the same partition than /, > because / is static and /tmp is frequently written to. If you don't > have enough space, I'd link /tmp to /var/tmp and create /var/tmp > with /var not mounted, so you also have a /tmp, in case /var isn't > mounted. or make /var/tmp a symlink to /tmp and make /tmp the seperate partition instead of /var/tmp. almost nothing uses /var/tmp whereas almost everything uses /tmp so this would seem more logical IMO. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
Attachment:
pgpok9U65dfOx.pgp
Description: PGP signature