Re: modules
Chanop Silpa-Anan wrote:
>
> Once upon a time, I heard Viktor Rosenfeld say
>
> > (**) I never understood why "dpkg -i" bitches about the fact that you
> > install the same kernel version as the currently running kernel. It
> > justifies it with possible confusion in /lib/modules/<version>, but
> > that's what I don't get. Newly compiled modules will overwrite the old,
> > and older kernel modules should still load perfectly, because they're
> > for the same kernel-version. What's the big deal then?
> Let's say you turn off apm, and remove some modules. If your old module with
> apm get loaded, ummm, I don't what's going to happen. May be nothing serious
> would happen.
I've never tried it before (and I am to lazy to compile a new kernel,
just to try it out), but I think modprobe/insmod would complain about
unresolved references and ... and that would be it.
MfG Viktor
--
Viktor Rosenfeld
E-Mail: mailto:rosenfel@informatik.hu-berlin.de
HertzSCHLAG: http://www.informatik.hu-berlin.de/~rosenfel/hs/
Reply to:
- References:
- modules
- From: Beavis <beavis@bidz.com>
- Re: modules
- From: Marcin Kurc <siemce@linux.indtech.edu>
- Re: modules
- From: Viktor Rosenfeld <rosenfel@informatik.hu-berlin.de>
- Re: modules
- From: Chanop Silpa-Anan <chanop@syseng.anu.edu.au>