[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Exim: frustrations configuring a satellite system



Onno wrote:

> What do the log files say?
>
> (/var/log/exim/*)
>
> Regards,
>
> Onno
>

Nothing special in rejectlog, and mainlog contains, for non-existing user on the
smarthost: (this generates an error mail OK):

2000-02-07 19:24:22 12Htlm-0004aH-00 <= orloff@debsat.domain.net U=orloff P=local
S=429 id=87k8kgzuhl.fsf@debsat.domain.net
2000-02-07 19:24:23 12Htlm-0004aH-00 ** no-exist@clermont.in2p3.fr R=smarthost
T=remote_smtp: SMTP error from remote mailer after RCPT
TO:<no-exist@clermont.in2p3.fr>: host mailserv.domain.net  [193.48.80.80]: 550
<no-exist@clermont.in2p3.fr >... User unknown
2000-02-07 19:24:23 12Htln-0004aJ-00 <= <> R=12Htlm-0004aH-00 U=mail P=local S=1377
2000-02-07 19:24:23 12Htlm-0004aH-00 Error message sent to orloff@debsat.domain.net
2000-02-07 19:24:23 12Htlm-0004aH-00 Completed

Notice: error mail is sent locally by exim. Whereas for a non-existing remote host,
exim transfers to the smarthost without choking:

2000-02-07 19:25:08 12HtmW-0004aO-00 <= orloff@debsat.domain.net U=orloff P=local
S=415 id=87hffkzugb.fsf@debsat.domain.net
2000-02-07 19:25:29 12HtmW-0004aO-00 => orloff@bad.host.com R=smarthost T=remote_smtp
H=mailserv.domain.net
2000-02-07 19:25:29 12HtmW-0004aO-00 Completed

and I never get any error message, despite the correct From and Sender header
(orloff@clermont.in2p3.fr)

Thanks for caring!

Jean Orloff

Amities,

                Jean Orloff
+++++++++       +       +       +       +       +       +       +       ++++++
+ Tel:(33)473.40.72.27                                Fax: (33)473.26.45.98  +
+++++++++       +       +       +       +       +       +       +       ++++++
Lettre reçue par une Compagnie d'Assurance.
   (de "Lettres allumées et courriers délirants, M. Petit, Eds. Max Valentin)

     C'est un chien dangereux, de ceux qui mangent des caniches à la télé.
+++++++++       +       +       +       +       +       +       +       ++++++




Reply to: