Re: 2.2 kernel
On Wed, 9 Feb 2000, Onno wrote:
Onno >2.2.13 and 2.2.14 are lokking good, is there anyone on this
Onno >list that find them unstable?
Onno >
i avoided 2.2.13 it was just a bug fixer from 2.2.12/.11 .14 has been ok
for me so far, although i have it installed on a BP6 that crashes on a
weekly basis as it is (.11 crashed on a daily basis)
i use 2.2.10 on my newer production machines, maybe i'll use 2.2.14 in the
future. still use 2.0 on my most important machines though (~4-6 months
uptime)
nate
----------------------------------------[mailto:aphro@aphroland.org ]--
Vice President Network Operations http://www.firetrail.com/
Firetrail Internet Services Limited http://www.aphroland.org/
Everett, WA 425-348-7336 http://www.linuxpowered.net/
Powered By: http://comedy.aphroland.org/
Debian 2.1 Linux 2.0.36 SMP http://yahoo.aphroland.org/
-----------------------------------------[mailto:aphro@netquest.net ]--
7:18am up 173 days, 19:31, 1 user, load average: 1.19, 1.11, 1.08
Reply to: