Re: 2.2 kernel
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 07:20:54AM -0800, aphro wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Feb 2000, Onno wrote:
>
> Onno >2.2.13 and 2.2.14 are lokking good, is there anyone on this
> Onno >list that find them unstable?
> Onno >
>
> i avoided 2.2.13 it was just a bug fixer from 2.2.12/.11 .14 has been ok
> for me so far, although i have it installed on a BP6 that crashes on a
> weekly basis as it is (.11 crashed on a daily basis)
2.2.13 is evil. it throughly and completely and repeatedly ruins
filesystems.
(i know not for everyone, but if you want to be scared into getting
rid of it i'll send the 64000+ byte output of fsck as it dumped 2/3 of
my / filesystem into /lost+found, to do `corrupted blocks' or some
such, then compare that to the changelog for 2.2.14 fixing a `obscure
block corruption bug'.... )
--
Ethan Benson
Reply to: