Re: Come on lorenzo, pleas stop the madness..
On Wed, Jan 19, 2000 at 10:01:55AM +0100, lorenzo.zampese@notes.electrolux.it wrote:
> I am very sorry for my return receipt, but if I could disable it I would do
> it.
I don't really believe that.
Please contact your system administrator, look at the options, or
unsubscribe from debian user and subscribe with another mail addres,
perhaps a webmail service or something like that...
The reward for answering your mail is a lot of crap from your mail
software, so that won't encourage people to answer your questions
either.
Wouter
>
> If somebody help me to configure 'exim', then I will not disturb anybody
> with my e-mails,
> and with my return receipts, because in that case I would use my Linux box,
> with a good
> MUA like MUTT.
>
> Sorry again.
>
>
> ------------------ Memo - Header -------------------
>
> To: Lorenzo Zampese/Electrolux Professional S.P.A./Italy/Electrolux
> Group
>
> cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>
> From: Wouter Hanegraaff <hanegraa@wins.uva.nl>
>
> Date: 19/01/2000 09.44.08 GMT
> 19/01/2000 10.44.56
>
> Subject: Come on lorenzo, pleas stop the madness..
>
> ----------------- Memo - Message ------------------
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi lorenzo,
>
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2000 at 10:01:50AM +0100,
> lorenzo.zampese@notes.electrolux.it wrote:
> >
> > Return Receipt
> >
> > Your Re: Is potatoe's exim 3.12-1 OK?
> > document:
> >
> > was Lorenzo Zampese/Electrolux Professional
> > received S.P.A./Italy/Electrolux Group
> > by:
> >
> > at: 10.33.44 Today
> >
>
> I keep getting mails like this from you if I send an e-mail do
> debian-users. Would you please be so kind to configer your mailer properly?
>
> I know you're out there because you just posted a message to debian-user
> so please do something about it.
>
> Slightly irritated,
>
> Wouter
>
> --
> Linux duckman 2.2.14 #1 Wed Jan 5 14:45:16 CET 2000 i586 unknown
> 10:39am up 2 days, 21:38, 1 user, load average: 0.12, 0.05, 0.01
>
>
>
>
--
Linux daria 2.2.14 #1 Wed Jan 5 14:00:40 CET 2000 i586 unknown
12:18pm up 3:12, 5 users, load average: 0.00, 0.02, 0.08
Reply to: