Re: my font suddently become very ugly
Shao Zhang wrote:
> Howard Mann [howardm@xmission.com] wrote:
> > Shao Zhang wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > A couple days ago, my font is just suddently become very ugly.
> > > I orginially thought it was the fvwm problem, then I found that
> > > all other window's manager have the same problem.
> > >
> >
> > I suggest you use True Type fonts utilizing the " xfstt" font server.
>
> Installing xfstt did not help at all. I have both xfs and xfstt
> running.
>
> [11:43|pts/1]shao@shao % xlsfonts| grep ttf |h
> -ttf-algerian-medium-r-normal-regular-0-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-1
> -ttf-arial black-medium-r-normal-regular-0-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-1
> -ttf-arial narrow-bold-i-normal-bold italic-0-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-1
> -ttf-arial narrow-bold-r-normal-bold-0-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-1
> -ttf-arial narrow-medium-i-normal-italic-0-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-1
> -ttf-arial narrow-medium-r-normal-regular-0-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-1
> -ttf-arial rounded mt bold-bold-r-normal-bold-0-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-1
> -ttf-arial-bold-i-normal-bold italic-0-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-1
> -ttf-arial-bold-r-normal-bold-0-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-1
> -ttf-arial-medium-i-normal-italic-0-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-1
>
>
> Here is the relevant entries in the /etc/X11/XFConfig file:
>
> FontPath "unix/:7101"
> FontPath "unix/:7100"
> FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/"
> FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled"
> FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/"
> FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo/"
> FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/"
> FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/chinese/:unscaled"
> FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/chinese/"
I have the Speedo and Type1 between 100dpi:unscaled and 100dpi, so if the correct
size is not found in 100dpi unscaled it will look in type1 *before* trying to scale
100dpi.
I've noticed also there are some apps which really want to use 75dpi fonts.
Enlightenment seems to be this way, when I didn't have 75dpi fonts the title bars
were quite ugly and the tooltips were empty! Installing 75dpi helped.
Zeen,
-Adam P.
Reply to: