Re: alien not y2k compliant?
*- On 1 Jan, Robert L. Harris wrote about "alien not y2k compliant?"
>
> Ok...
> I'm trying to scan myself and build a nice little security tool. This
> is the first thing I've run into but still....
>
>
>
>
> {0}:wally:/usr/src/Util-System/nmap>alien -d nmap-2.3BETA12*rpm
> -- Examining nmap-2.3BETA12-1.i386.rpm
> -- Unpacking nmap-2.3BETA12-1.i386.rpm
> 1222 blocks
> -- Automatic package debianization
> alien: 822-date did not return a valid result.
>
A quick look through the changelog for the versions between slink and
potato didn't show and y2k fixes but I did find the following:
alien (6.26) unstable; urgency=low
* If 822-date fails, the error now suggests installing dpkg-dev. This is
way up there in the alien faw(sic, faq) and I'm tired of answering it.
Since you did not get a suggestion about dpkg-dev I assume you are using
a version prior to 6.26. Just to make sure, do you have dpkg-dev
installed? In slink dpkg-dev was only a Recommends dependency for
alien, in potato it is a Depends dependency.
Brian Servis
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mechanical Engineering | Never criticize anybody until you
Purdue University | have walked a mile in their shoes,
servis@purdue.edu | because by that time you will be a
http://www.ecn.purdue.edu/~servis | mile away and have their shoes.
Reply to: